Eco-evolutionary Game Dynamics with Synergy and Discounting

Requires a Wolfram Notebook System

Interact on desktop, mobile and cloud with the free Wolfram CDF Player or other Wolfram Language products.

Requires a Wolfram Notebook System

Edit on desktop, mobile and cloud with any Wolfram Language product.

Combining nonlinear public goods games with population dynamics, this Demonstration plots the density of cooperators in the population as a function of the population density (1 minus the empty spaces, ). For , the population has reached the ecological limit, while for , it is extinct.

Contributed by: Chaitanya S. Gokhale (June 2014)
Open content licensed under CC BY-NC-SA



This Demonstration combines the results of [1] and [2]; [1] discusses the impact of nonlinear benefits in public goods games, while [2] incorporated ecological dynamics into standard evolutionary game dynamics.

Here the nonlinearity is given by the synergy/discounting parameter . When , we have linearity. When , the benefits get added up synergistically, with each additional cooperator contributing more than the previous one. When , the benefits saturate for a certain number of cooperators. The frequencies of cooperators and defectors in the population are given by and . Since each individual in the population has one of these two strategies, we have . However, the sum may be less than the carrying capacity of the environment. Hence if we consider and to be the fractions of the two strategies, then we can have as the fraction of empty spaces. Tracking the ecological dynamics then amounts to looking at the temporal evolution of the population density , while the evolutionary dynamics are the temporal evolution of the strategies within the population density. The dynamics of the empty sites and the fraction of cooperators are given by



where ;

is the benefit multiplier; is the death rate; is the synergy/discounting factor, and is the group size.


[1] C. Hauert, F. Michor, M. A. Nowak, and M. Doebeli, "Synergy and Discounting of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas," Journal of Theoretical Biology, 239(2), 2006 pp. 195–202.

[2] C. Hauert, M. Holmes, and M. Doebeli, "Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics: Maintenance of Cooperation in Public Goods Games," Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273(1600), 2006 pp. 2565–2571.

Feedback (field required)
Email (field required) Name
Occupation Organization
Note: Your message & contact information may be shared with the author of any specific Demonstration for which you give feedback.