Efficacy of Degenerate Keyboard Maps

Requires a Wolfram Notebook System

Interact on desktop, mobile and cloud with the free Wolfram CDF Player or other Wolfram Language products.

Requires a Wolfram Notebook System

Edit on desktop, mobile and cloud with any Wolfram Language product.

Some devices with limited size, such as smart phones, implement a reduced keyboard, with each key mapping to several letters. The effectiveness of the keyboard rests upon how well keystrokes distinguish between words of equal length. Keyboards with fewer than 26 keys map one key to a subset of letters. Then typing out a word often specifies a list of possibilities from which the intended word must be chosen.

[more]

The graphs here illustrate the balance between degeneracy and the number of keys for different mappings. For coarser mappings there are larger groups of words that share the same keystrokes. Each point represents the number of words with a certain degeneracy. The first point, for the group with degeneracy of one, on the left side, is for words that are totally differentiated by a particular keyboard map. The next point, degeneracy of two, is for words that have one other candidate word from the same keystrokes, and so on.

[less]

Contributed by: Jim Gerdy (March 2011)
Open content licensed under CC BY-NC-SA


Snapshots


Details

The dropdown menu contains common mappings shown as lists of groups of keys. One example is the telephone, with three to four letters per key over eight keys. The other control chooses the number of words to calculate on, chosen from a list of the most used words. The graph then shows the number of lists of words that cannot be distinguished by the keystrokes for each keyboard. For a full 26-letter keyboard all words are distinguishable, but for other keyboard there are groups of two or more words that are indistinguishable. On most devices these short lists are disambiguated by a further selection.

The efficacy of reduced keyboards can be seen as the clusters of degenerate words remain small. For instance, for the telephone mapping the top 50 words are all distinguished and the next 50 have only two pair of words that must be selected from later.

Other mappings seen in smart phones include using whole rows or half-rows of the keyboard, so that keys have two letters each. In all cases, even with crude keyboards that have only six or even three buttons, disambiguation seems a palatable task. That is, typing in the smart phone keyboard can produce a handful of candidate words that can be chosen from on the display. Furthermore, as most software lists the candidate words in order of common usage, these keyboards are practical to use. Only the very crudest, a three-key keyboard (with ten letters on one key) creates rather long lists of specified words.



Feedback (field required)
Email (field required) Name
Occupation Organization
Note: Your message & contact information may be shared with the author of any specific Demonstration for which you give feedback.
Send