The blue curve represents the initial reactant (locally excited state), while the yellow curve represents the final product (after charge separation). Also shown as vertical lines are the driving force (black), the barrier (red) and the total reorganization energy (blue). and are the redox energies of the donor and acceptor (in the same solvent with dielectric constant epsEC versus the same reference electrode); is the center-to-center distance; and are the ionic radii; is the electronic coupling; is the internal reorganization energy; the eps are dielectric constants; and is the refractive index. is the singlet state energy (or triplet state energy) of the system.

Shown at the top are the driving force, total reorganization energy, solvent reorganization energy, barrier to electron transfer and the pre-exponential factor. The starting data comes from C60[11]DMA in a benzonitrile solvent [3]. For a neutral donor and acceptor, the Coulomb correction equals 1. For a charge shift reaction, it is 0. For charged initial reactants but neutral products, it is (use the "Coulomb correction " slider). Use the axis minimum/maximum sliders to scale the graph.

This project is based on two Demonstrations developed by students (see Related Links). Those projects actually contain a minor error (for the barrier), but they inspired me to develop this project. Their modified code is used in this project and I thank these people very much!

Nobel Prize winner Rudolph Marcus developed the theory of electron transfer [1]. The classical Marcus equation (CME) is based on two simultaneous quadratic relations, involving the driving force (), the internal and external (solvent) reorganization energy ( and ) and the electronic coupling (). The CME underestimates the electron transfer rate in the inverted region [2, 3].

We can also use the so-called Closs and Miller data [4], which provided the first experimental proof of the inverted region. This is a charge shift reaction, so the Coulomb correction should be set to zero. We can approach the measured rates [5] by using the appropriate input parameters, like we show for C60[11]DMA in benzonitrile for charge separation. Additional information on the Marcus theory and electron transfer is available in [6–9].

See [10] for some further examples from literature data and test data.

Note that under certain "unrealistic" conditions, the solvent reorganization can become negative (which makes no physical sense). This results in complex number solutions and imaginary electron transfer rates (e.g. with low and high and , you can get ). In order to avoid Mathematica plotting problems we take the absolute value of the total reorganization energy.