In Bohm's reformulation of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen experiment a spinzero particle decays into two spin ( , ) particles moving in opposite directions. The particles are detected by two polarization filters (Stern–Gerlach devices, SG1 and SG2) oriented by an angle (for particle 1) and an angle (for particle 2) with respect to the vertical (positive ) direction. Two counters register spin (+ ) particles only. In the theoretical description, denotes the joint probability that particle 1 passes SG1 at the angle and particle 2 passes SG2 at the angle . From classical probability analysis, J. S. Bell (1964) derived the following inequality for three joint probabilities connected with arbitrary angles , , and , where , known as Bell's inequality: . However, quantum theoretical calculations yield the result , which violates Bell's inequality for certain special angles , , and ; for example, if , , , then the inequality gives ! This Demonstration shows in green regions where the quantum result is contrary to Bell's inequality.
Quantum mechanics does not make definite predictions for the outcome of measurements. If the actual state of the physical system is known, then probabilities for the possible measurements can be calculated. For many natural scientists it is difficult to accept that in an experiment a definite final state is chosen from among all the possible outcomes. The quantum theory seems to be incomplete. Thus some people have tried to make the quantum theory "complete" and "deterministic" with the help of the inclusion "hidden variables" in the theoretical description. Bell's inequality is an expression of expected classical results. There are some different versions of Bell's inequality related to the one shown here . All experimental results on twophoton correlations thus far [4] have shown violations of Bell's inequality. A tentative conclusion from these results has been summarized as "Bell's theorem": No physical theory of local hidden variables can ever reproduce all the predictions of quantum mechanics. There still remain, however, a number of unlikely but possible philosophical loopholes that have been evoked in counterarguments. [1] M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. [2] F. Schwabl, Quantenmechanik, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer–Verlag, 1993. [3] J. Audretsch, Verschränkte Systeme—Die Quantenphysik auf neuen Wegen, Berlin: WileyVCH, 2005. [4] A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, "Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using TimeVarying Analyzers, Physical Review Letters 49, 1982 pp. 1804–1807.
