Bifurcation in a Biochemical Reactor

Initializing live version
Download to Desktop

Requires a Wolfram Notebook System

Interact on desktop, mobile and cloud with the free Wolfram Player or other Wolfram Language products.

In 1942, Monod proposed the following form of the specific growth coefficient:


The specific growth coefficient with the substrate inhibition is given by


The biochemical reactor is governed by two coupled equations



where is the biomass concentration, is the substrate concentration, is the dilution rate, is the yield, is the feed substrate concentration, and is the specific growth coefficient.

The steady states are the solutions of the following system of equations:



The trivial solution is obtained for and . This corresponds to a situation where there are no cells left in the reactor, a phenomena called wash out.

The nontrivial solution is obtained if and .

This Demonstration finds the nontrivial steady states and shows the bifurcation diagram ( versus the bifurcation parameter ).

For the Monod case there is a single nontrivial steady state if . This steady state is stable. On the other hand, the trivial steady state is either stable (when ) or unstable ().

For the model, there are two nontrivial steady states if the value of is in the pink region (click "nontrivial steady state"). In that case, the following inequalities hold: . The magenta dot (low value of ) is stable because . The cyan dot (intermediate value of ) is unstable (a saddle point) because . The trivial solution is either stable () or unstable (). If , there is only one nontrivial steady state indicated by the magenta dot (low value of ). This steady state is stable because . The other value of verifies , thus (i.e., this solution is not feasible). Finally, if , nontrivial solutions are not possible.


Contributed by: Housam Binous, Ahmed Bellagi, and Brian G. Higgins (October 2013)
Open content licensed under CC BY-NC-SA




[1] B. W. Bequette, Process Dynamics, Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.

Feedback (field required)
Email (field required) Name
Occupation Organization
Note: Your message & contact information may be shared with the author of any specific Demonstration for which you give feedback.