# Equivalential Formula

Requires a Wolfram Notebook System

Interact on desktop, mobile and cloud with the free Wolfram Player or other Wolfram Language products.

This Demonstration enables the user to decide whether a formula of equivalential calculus is a tautology. Is there any simple rule? The Demonstration also introduces the notion of the set of a formula, a measure of the symmetry of the formula of equivalential calculus.

Contributed by: Izidor Hafner (August 2016)

Open content licensed under CC BY-NC-SA

## Snapshots

## Details

In 1929 Le\:015bniewski recognized that the equivalential calculus could be axiomatized. He also observed that a formula of propositional calculus in which equivalence is the only propositional function is a tautology if and only if each propositional letter occurs an even number of times [1].

The notion of the set of a formula of propositional calculus with negation, implication, disjunction and conjunction is introduced in [2].

The definition for the equivalence is given in [3]:

if is a propositional variable, otherwise .

This definition has a simple consequence for equivalential calculus: a subformula of a formula is in iff there is an odd number of occurrences of in formula . So is a tautology iff no propositional variable is in .

This notion also gives a linear lower bound on the proof length in equivalential calculus with an axiom schema (where substitution is applicable only to an axiom). We must only construct a set of tautologies with large sets.

The notion also provides a measure for the symmetry of formulas. Only formulas like have singleton sets.

References

[1] J. Łukasiewicz, "The Equivalential Calculus," in *Polish Logic (1920–1939)* (S. McCall, ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967, pp. 90–91.

[2] G. S. Ceitin and A. A. Chubaryan, "Some Estimates of Proof Length in Classical Propositional Calculus (in Russian)," *Mathematical Questions of Cybernetics and Computation*, Erevan, DAN Arm. SSR, 1975 pp. 57–64.

[3] I. Hafner, "On Lower Bound of the Proof Length in the Equivalential Calculus," *Glasnik Matematički*, 20(40), 1985 pp. 269–270.

## Permanent Citation