First- and Second-Order Transfer Functions

Initializing live version
Download to Desktop

Requires a Wolfram Notebook System

Interact on desktop, mobile and cloud with the free Wolfram Player or other Wolfram Language products.

This Demonstration plots the time-domain response of a system with a step input of unity. Select either a first-order plus dead time (FOPDT) model or a second-order plus dead time (SOPDT) model. Set the time constant to change how quickly the system reaches a new steady state, the process gain to change how aggressively the system responds to the unity step input and the dead time that delays the system response by a value of . For the second-order process, change the damping coefficient with a slider. The damping coefficient is a measure of the magnitude of damping, which affects the degree of oscillation in the response. Dimensionless time is used.

Contributed by: Rachael L. Baumann and Adam J. Johnston (September 2017)
Additional contributions by: John L. Falconer
(University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering)
Open content licensed under CC BY-NC-SA


Snapshots


Details

The general first-order transfer function in the Laplace domain is:

,

where is the process gain, is the time constant, is the system dead time or lag and is a Laplace variable. The process gain is the ratio of the output response to the input (unit step for this Demonstration), the time constant determines how quickly the process responds or how rapidly the output changes and the dead time delays the system response by the amount .

This Demonstration converts from the Laplace domain to the time domain for a step-response input. For a first-order transfer function, the time-domain response is:

.

The general second-order transfer function in the Laplace domain is:

,

where is the (dimensionless) damping coefficient.

For a step-response input, the time-domain response for various damping coefficients are:

Overdamped ():

.

Critically damped ():

.

Underdamped ():

.

Reference

[1] D. E. Seborg, D. A. Mellichamp, T. F. Edgar and F. J. Doyle, III, Process Dynamics and Control, 3rd ed., Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2011 pp. 76, 81.



Feedback (field required)
Email (field required) Name
Occupation Organization
Note: Your message & contact information may be shared with the author of any specific Demonstration for which you give feedback.
Send