 # Graphics Lighting Transformation

Initializing live version Requires a Wolfram Notebook System

Interact on desktop, mobile and cloud with the free Wolfram Player or other Wolfram Language products.

A sphere can be transformed into a spheroid by either a scale transformation or by changing the plot range while keeping the bounding box ratios constant. These transformations are specified by the spheroid control setting, which gives the vertical over horizontal semi-axis ratio of the resulting spheroid. A control setting less than 1 gives an oblate spheroid, greater than 1 a prolate spheroid, and equal to 1 an untransformed sphere.

[more]

Though a scale and a plot range transformation can generate the same spheroid, these transformations differ in their effect on lighting. The scale transformation leaves the lighting direction fixed, but the plot range transformation applies the same transformation to both the sphere and the light source. This distinction is shown by introducing two light sources: a fixed cyan light source that is excluded from the sphere to spheroid transformation and a transformed magenta source that is included in the transformation.

The light angle control specifies a 0 to radian inclination angle of these light sources before any transformation. The cyan light source direction is simply specified by the light angle control without any transformation effect and is thus independent of the spheroid control setting. On the other hand, the magenta light source direction is determined by applying the spheroid transformation to a lighting direction vector with an inclination angle specified by the light angle control. This magenta lighting direction thus depends on both spheroid and light angle control settings.

The cyan and magenta light sources have the same direction if the light angle is 0, /2, or , or if the spheroid setting is 1, which are all situations where the spheroid transformation does not change the direction of the magenta source. The light source control toggles the light sources on and off. The cyan source is controlled by the fixed button, so named because this light source does not transform, and the magenta light source is controlled by the transformed button, so named because this source is transformed.

The diffuse reflected light intensity of a surface that obeys Lambert's law depends on the cosine of the angle between the surface normal and the light source direction. This means that the surface appears brightest at the point where a light source is normally incident. The normal incident points for the fixed cyan light source and transformed magenta light source are indicated by cyan and magenta arrows on the spheroid's surface. It is evident that even though the lighting direction of the cyan source is fixed by the light angle control, its point of normal incidence on the spheroid varies with the spheroid control setting.

[less]

Contributed by: Christopher Haydock  (February 2013)
(Applied New Science LLC)
Open content licensed under CC BY-NC-SA

## Snapshots   ## Details

The details setter bar selects the main view (snapshot 1) and the basic and advanced detail views (snapshots 2 and 3), which show 2D cross-sections defined by the intersection of the vertical spheroid symmetry axis and the lighting direction. The left side of the basic view shows the fixed cyan light source and the spheroid generated by a scale transformation. The right basic view shows the transformed magenta light source and the spheroid generated by changing the plot range. The left and right cross-sections also indicate the normal incidence points and terminators for the cyan and magenta light sources. As the spheroid control is varied, it is evident that the left axis labels, plot range, and cyan lighting direction remain constant because this spheroid transformation involves only scaling the sphere, whereas the right axis labels and magenta light direction vary continuously with the spheroid setting because this spheroid transformation changes the plot range. Finally, the black radial vector on the right basic view is useful for visual confirmation that the magenta light source is a constant before transformation. As the spheroid control moves through the oblate range, it is possible to visualize a 3D disk rotating about the horizontal axis and imagine that the radial vector is fixed on the disk, and likewise in the prolate range to visualize a 3D disk with fixed radial vector rotating about the vertical axis.

All the transformations appearing in the source code are derived from the following definitions and equations. A point on the elliptical cross-section through the vertical symmetry axis of a spheroid can be simply parameterized by the angle , such that a point is given by the action of a positive valued diagonal matrix on a unit angle vector : , , , .

The unit angle vector component is given by and the component by because the inclination angle is measured from the vertical. The diagonal components of the matrix are the spheroid equatorial radius and polar radius , or equivalently, the ellipse horizontal radius and vertical radius . A normal vector at a point is given by a 90° rotation of the point vector partial derivative with respect to the parameter: , , .

The scale factor sets the normal vector exactly equal to the action of the inverse diagonal matrix on the unit angle vector and makes explicit the symmetry of a spheroid point and its normal, which are respectively generated by the action of the diagonal matrix and its inverse on the angle vector. The above normal vector equation essentially gives a relation between the light angle and the point of normal incidence. To complete this relation, let curly be the light inclination angle from vertical and set the corresponding unit angle vector equal to the normalized normal vector: .

Given a parameterized point on a spheroid, this equation gives the light angle that is normally incident on that point. In practice we usually want the inverse angle relation, that is, given the light angle curly find the normal incidence point angle parameter plain . The inverse relation is easily derived by left-multiplying both sides of the above curly equation by the diagonal matrix and normalizing: .

For more on Lambertian diffuse reflections, see the Mathematica tutorial "Lighting and Surface Properties".

## Permanent Citation

Christopher Haydock

 Feedback (field required) Email (field required) Name Occupation Organization Note: Your message & contact information may be shared with the author of any specific Demonstration for which you give feedback. Send