 # Calculation of Diagnostic Accuracy Measures

Initializing live version Requires a Wolfram Notebook System

Interact on desktop, mobile and cloud with the free Wolfram Player or other Wolfram Language products.

This Demonstration shows calculations of point estimations and confidence intervals for various accuracy measures of a diagnostic test for a disease. This is done for differing negative and positive test results of nondiseased and diseased populations and differing -values for the estimations of the lower and upper bounds of the confidence intervals. The calculated measures are the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value (PPV), the negative predictive value (NPV), the (diagnostic) odds ratio (OR), the likelihood ratio for a positive test result (LR+) and the likelihood ratio for a negative test result (LR−). The measures can be selected using the menu. The negative and positive test results of the nondiseased and diseased populations, along with the -value, are chosen using the sliders.

Contributed by: Theodora Chatzimichail and Aristides T. Hatjimihail (June 2018)
(Hellenic Complex Systems Laboratory)
Open content licensed under CC BY-NC-SA

## Snapshots   ## Details

Sensitivity refers to the fraction of the diseased population with a positive test result, while specificity is the fraction of the nondiseased population with a negative test result. Positive predictive value is the fraction of the population with a positive test result that is diseased, while negative predictive value is the fraction of the population with a negative test result that is not diseased. Prevalence of the disease is the ratio of the diseased population to the total (nondiseased and diseased) population. If we denote by the sensitivity, the specificity and the prevalence, we have: , , .

The Wilson score method with continuity correction is used  for calculating the confidence intervals of the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value and the negative predictive value.

For the calculation of the confidence intervals of the (diagnostic) odds ratio, the likelihood ratio for a positive test result and the likelihood ratio for a negative test result, it is assumed that their natural logarithms have asymptotically normal distributions .

This Demonstration is an extension of another Demonstration  and is appropriate as an educational and research tool.

References

 J. L. Fleiss, B. Levin and M. C. Paik, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 3rd ed., Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley, 2003.

 T. Chatzimichaill, "Calculator for Diagnostic Accuracy Measures" from the Wolfram Demonstrations Project—A Wolfram Web Resource. demonstrations.wolfram.com/CalculatorForDiagnosticAccuracyMeasures.

## Permanent Citation

Theodora Chatzimichail and Aristides T. Hatjimihail

 Feedback (field required) Email (field required) Name Occupation Organization Note: Your message & contact information may be shared with the author of any specific Demonstration for which you give feedback. Send